Connect with us

Politics

Commentary: Report: Nat’l Guard General Wants To Bring His Soldiers Home, Biden Admin Refuses Request

Published

on

Commentary: Report: Nat'l Guard General Wants To Bring His Soldiers Home, Biden Admin Refuses Request

[ad_1]

The Pentagon announced on Tuesday that Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III approved a request from U.S. Capitol Police for 2,300 National Guard troops to remain in Washington, DC until May 23, 2021. There are currently 5,200 troops already spread to the Capitol.

On Thursday, the Fox News Channel Obtained a copy of a memo written by Gen. Daniel R. Hokanson, head of the National Guard Bureau, where he explained why the National Guard “cannot and should not fulfill the request of Capitol Police troops at this time.”

Hokanson questioned that “the National Guard has gone too far because of coronavirus barriers, civil unrest and fires. Efforts so far have not been able to get enough volunteers in the supporting states to meet the request. USCP 2,280 soldiers, nor Option B 1000 soldiers. “

“I am concerned that the continuing uncertain nature of this requirement may also hinder our ability to drive future missions because both adjutants general and custodians may be skeptical about providing the future efforts, “he added.

According to Fox, Hokanson’s memo spread within the White House National Security Council last week.

The memo revealed Hokanson’s option was overranted by Austin, who decided to keep having 2,280 troops in “continue the support mission”In the capitol.

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby spoke to reporters on Wednesday.

“[Y]es, the Department of Defense is funding it because we funded the previous mission, which ends over the weekend, ”he said.“ But that’s not how anyone views it or foisting the Capitol police, that they view it as free labor. “

Kirby claimed that “they have a legitimate need for some capacity assistance at a time that is relatively uncertain now … [I]It’s not just about risk the environment in a highly polarized, overly charged environment we live in today. It’s about a capacity boost to the Capitol Police as they begin to grind and develop what it will take them a long time to deal with a new reality on Capitol Hill. “

The price tag for National Guard troops from January to March is $ 410 million, and the extension from March to May will cost an additional $ 111 million, according to The Wall Street Journal.

According to The hill, Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the head of the House Armed Services Committee, and committee member Republican Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama released a joint statement Thursday saying they were “seriously confused” that “our nation’s place of democracy remains heavily protected by guards and surrounded by a perimeter fence. “

“While the U.S. Capitol Police continues to uphold the capability of its personnel, there is no doubt that some level of support from the National Guard must remain in the National Capital Region to respond to credible threats against the Capitol,” he said. of the statement.

“However, the current security posture is not guaranteed right now.… We appreciate our watchdogs responding to the call to protect the Capitol, but it’s time for us to check what level of security is needed, so they can go home to their families and communities. “

Following the unrest at the Capitol on Jan. 6, Democrats led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi insisted on an overwhelming, unprecedented and unnecessary level of security. Ahead of the inauguration on January 20, there is more 25,000 National Guard troops protecting the capitol.

In addition, a seven-foot-tall, three-mile-long security fence with a razor blade was installed along the top. Pelosi, who is trying to create the impression that President Donald Trump’s supporters are a serious threat to lawmakers ’safety, even though magnetometers are set at entrances to the House chamber.

In January, Ken Cuccinelli, who served as acting Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security at the time of the Capitol siege, made an alarming revelation in a interview with Fox News’ Martha MacCallum in his show, “The Story.”

The two discussed the massive presence of National Guard troops deployed in Washington, DC, and MacCallum pointed out that 25,000 are many times the levels of troops currently serving in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Agreeing with MacCallum, Cuccinelli replied that 25,000 troops equals an entire division. He then revealed that Pelosi had requested the “last up of the final troop” and requested machine guns made by personnel.

“A division. You have a division,” he told the host. “These last thousands of troops were requested by the spokesman by the Capitol Police. He even wanted machine-manned machine guns in Washington. That was rejected because there was no simple use for that in a security arrangement for a civilian work. Just – so some of them exceed any legitimate security requirements. “

Surprisingly Pelosi thought this was a reasonable request. Machine-crew machine guns are the types of weapons you see deployed against citizens in places like North Korea, Russia and almost every African dictatorship.

These are not rifles or pistols, but weapons delivered by personnel. They can release the hurt in ways that a common-issue carbine cannot do. Fully automatic and made to deal with enemy armed fighters, it should not be used against civilians.

So, the question remains, why did the Biden Administration overturn the decision of the head of the National Guard Bureau? He clarified his branch was stretched too thin and their current position was unstable.

These troops were forced away from family and friends only to serve as props for the speaker of the House, and the sum costs to US taxpayers is ahead of $ 500 million.

I can think of two reasons for having troops.

First, it allows Democrats to perpetuate the myth that they need protection from unmarked “domestic terrorists” who support former President Trump.

The other possibility is that, knowing full well their unprecedented and non-American seizure of power and their transformation into a formerly superb country, Democrats may fear retaliation from the people.

If I’ve done everything Democrats need to weaken our democratic republic, it’s not crazy for me to think I need protection as well.

This article originally appeared on The Western Journal.



[ad_2]

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *