Connect with us

Latest

Idaho GOP governor signs ‘heartbeat’ abortion ban into law

Published

on

[ad_1]

“We should never give in to our efforts to protect the lives of the preborn,” said Brad Little, a Republican governor of Idaho. a statement announcing the signing of the bill and adding that he was “proud to sign the bill today.”
The Idaho bill, which states it will only go into effect if a federal court of appeals confirms another heartbeat ban. Monday, Oklahoma was enacted the prohibition of almost total abortion and the prohibition of heartbeats. Later that day, Montana banned abortion at 20 weeks file-based scientifically disputed notion that a fetus may feel pain at this time of development.
HB 366 of Idaho requires abortion providers to check for a fetal heartbeat and would prohibit abortions if one is detected. It makes exceptions for medical emergencies “to prevent death (an abortion applicant) or for which a delay creates a serious risk of substantial and irreversible deterioration of a major bodily function.” It also includes exceptions for rape and incest if a police agency or child welfare services have been reported and a copy of the report has been given to the abortion provider.

State laws, which could soon face legal challenges in light of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion nationwide before viability, send a broad message that the fight at the level of state for access to the procedure is far from over. Republican-controlled states have advanced a wave of anti-abortion bills this year that are in line with the Trump presidency’s trend, while the Biden administration has sought to expand protections against abortion, specifically by reversing restrictions of the Trump era.

Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and Hawaii clashed with Little after the bill was signed, accusing him of signing the bill just to appease his “radical supporters.”

“Let’s be clear: abortion is still completely legal in Idaho, even after six weeks. This legislation doesn’t change anything,” the group said. published in a statement. “What it really does is simply prepare Idaho for a lawsuit if a similar ban in another federal court confirms its unconstitutional legislation, and there’s no indication that this would ever happen. But even if it does, we’ll start a demand immediately to stop it “.

Idaho State Representative Steven Harris, who sponsored the bill, told CNN Tuesday that someone who didn’t know she was pregnant “shouldn’t change the outcome.”

“Is there supposed to be a period of time that says“ inside some window can I abort the baby? “” He said. “It doesn’t make much sense from a pro-life standpoint.”

When asked about the requirements for rape or incest exceptions, Harris noted prior approval. Abortion measure in Idaho – which would take effect only if Roe is revoked – with similar requirements for rape and incest victims, saying that “we were careful in these areas to reproduce what was already in the current Idaho code, as it did not complicate the idea with other topics “. “

Harris said that while he sees no legal action in favor of the bill, “the more they see the courts that states consider to have a strong interest, the more they will decide in our favor, so that’s the hope.” “.

Before this week, South Carolina enacted a heartbeat ban in February and Arkansas legalized the ban on near-total abortion in March. Of the 15 so-called gestational bans (which prohibit abortions after a certain time of pregnancy) have already passed since early 2019, none came into force after most of them were blocked by the judges. Oklahoma bills are scheduled to go into effect on November 1 and Montana bills on October 1.
The Biden administration has done this before moved to support abortion rights through a number of different policies. Earlier this month, the Food and Drug Administration withdrew during the Covid-19 pandemic the requirement that one of the drugs involved in abortion medication will be dispensed in person, and the Department of Health and Human Services went the other way around a rule of the Trump era banning certain federally funded health care providers from referring patients for abortions, a step long demanded by abortion rights groups.

.

[ad_2]