Connect with us


McConnell Dismisses Calls for Filibuster Reform: ‘It’s Not Broken’




Head of the Senate Minority Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) No reason was found to change the filibuster or to remove it.

He was asked Tuesday afternoon if he would support a move to “reform” the filibuster.

“It’s not broken, and it doesn’t need to be fixed,” McConnell replied as he noted the Democrats ’filtering of legislation in former President Donald Trump’s tenure.

He continued, “I didn’t respond there by saying, ‘Okay, we’re going to change the Senate rules to get in our way. It’s not broken, and there’s no need to fix it. It’s a solution to finding a problem. It’s not a problem anymore. the Senate stopped bad ideas or negotiated solutions with two parties. “

Watch the video below:

The Senate website refers the filibuster as “a loosely defined term for action designed to prolong debate and delay or prevent a vote on a bill, resolution, amendment, or other controversial question.”

Under current Senate rules, that means a majority of the law would require a 60-vote.

In an equal division of the chamber, Democrats will need to win at least 10 Republicans to pass the law.

That led to some call for the filibuster to be eliminated, which would allow Democrats to pass legislation with just 51 votes, as Vice President Kamala Harris the voter may vote binding.

McConnell warned Democrats said Tuesday that removing the filibuster would lead to a “completely burnt ground” Senate and previous efforts to touch the law were “child play.”

He also claims that Republicans will take advantage of the lack of filibuster to pass conservative policies with “zero input” from Democrats if they get the majority.

If they want to get rid of the filibuster, Democrats will need every member of their caucus to vote in favor of the move.

However, Sen. Joe Manchin (DW. Va.) Said he would not support pushing to remove the filibuster.

But he signaled that he would be open to making changes to it, as Reported by IJR. He told Fox News’ Chris Wallace, “The filibuster has to be painful, it really has to be painful, and we’ve made it more comfortable over the years, unintentionally.”

“Maybe it needs to be more painful. Maybe you need to stand there. There are things we can talk about,” he added.


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *