Connect with us


WATCH: McCarthy Spars With Reporter Over Disputed Iowa Congressional Race




House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) There has been a hot exchange of why he supported the former President Donald Trumpchallenge to Congressional election votes while opposing the challenge from a Democratic House candidate who lost their election.

At a press conference Thursday, McCarthy was asked what the difference was between Trump’s efforts to overthrow the presidential election and Iowa Democrat Rita Hart’s decision to contest his loss in the election to the House.

CNN’s Manu Raju asked, “In your view, what’s the difference between efforts to overthrow the House election versus Donald Trump’s efforts to overthrow the Congressional elections you support?”

“So, I don’t agree with the premise of your question,” McCarthy replied as he claimed Trump’s challenge of electoral votes in Arizona and Pennsylvania would not change the outcome of the election.

However, the Trump campaign filed dozens of lawsuits Opposing the election results on the battleground means he is defeated, which could change the outcome of the election if they are successful – which they are not.

In addition, members of Congress were initially expected to challenge election votes in nearly five battlefield states when lawmakers met to validate the Electoral College vote.

When asked if he regretted supporting a demand from the state of Texas seeking to disqualify electoral voters of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – which President Joe Biden won – McCarthy said, “No, no, no, I won’t.”

“You know why? Because it will go to court,” he added.

In addition, he testified that he “should have” supported the lawsuit in Texas “because that’s where you go” for election disputes.

Watch the video below:

McCarthy said Hart brought his dispute in the House instead of going to a court to dispute his loss, which Raju confirmed to be correct.

Raju said Hart went to Congress to dispute the election loss because “he didn’t have time.”

However, McCarthy shot again, “No, no, no, no, he didn’t say he didn’t have time. Do you know what he said? ‘Because that’s where I can get the outcome I want.’ That’s what he said. ”

“So the premise of your question doesn’t work … He didn’t go to the courts. Did he win it on election day? No. Did he win the recount? No. Speaker Pelosi said it was only six votes “He got six members who will disqualify the more than 400,000 people who voted in that district. Pure politics … Don’t mistake things for different things,” he added.

Hart, who lost his election in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District by six votes to Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks, asked the House to investigate and reverse the election because he said 22 votes were not counted, which would change the outcome of the election.

“After reviewing the ballots and making sure they are counted, it will be clear that I won this election. It is very important to me to make sure that the bipartisan review of the U.S. House is fair. Iowans should know that the candidate earned most votes are seated, ”Hart said of the controversy.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Agreed. temporary seat Miller-Meeks while Hart’s dispute is being investigated.

He told reporters last week that “of course” there is a chance the House will overturn the results of Iowa’s race election.


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *